[Craters by age] [Volcano and climate change links] [Updates] [Chicxulub debate][More on extinctions] [Falklands] [Impacts and vulcanism] [Shiva Hypothesis - periodic extinctions]
The following graph shows impact craters on Earth by age and diameter. Also shown are the main geologic boundaries involving mass extinctions (tall, bold lines), minor boundaries (thin, short lines - fewer extinctions) and the approximate timing of "flood basalt eruptions". Originally the graph only showed craters which aligned with major extinction events but it was considered better to show all craters 20km diameter or more to avoid "counting the hits and ignoring the misses". Those which appear to align with a geologic boundary are shown as dark blue diamonds. The most notable is Chicxulub at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary - the event that saw the extinction of the dinosaurs. The concept of this graph was later used in a Scientific American article about mass extinctions.
Since multiple impacts appear to be very common throughout the solar system it is expected that some of the smaller craters are associated with other major impacts, evidence of which has not been discovered or has vanished over time. For example, the Triassic/Jurassic and Jurassic/Cretaceous boundaries appear to involve multiple impacts. Craters 40km diameter or more are likely to be caused by 2km diameter asteorids or comets. Such impacts would probably result in severe global climate disruption but it takes an asteroid/comet 10km or larger to cause mass extinctions. It is estimated that such impacts occur, on average, once every 50 to 100 million years.
Graph best viewed 1024x768
Here is some of the data used for the graph. (Ma = Million
Years).
|
|
Ma |
MARGIN Ma |
|
Siljan |
52
|
368
|
Sweden | |
Charlevoix |
54
|
357
|
15
|
Quebec, Canada |
Araguainha Dome |
40
|
247
|
5.5
|
Brazil |
Rochechouart |
25
|
214
|
8
|
France (see Nature 395, p126, 1998) |
Red Wing |
9
|
200
|
25
|
North Dakota, U.S.A. |
Obolon |
15
|
215
|
25
|
Ukraine |
St Martin |
40
|
219
|
32
|
Manitoba, Canada (see Nature 395, p126, 1998) |
Manicouagan |
100
|
214
|
1
|
Quebec, Canada (see Nature 395, p126, 1998) |
Puchezh-Katunki |
80
|
175
|
3
|
Russia |
Gosses Bluff |
24
|
142.5
|
0.8
|
Australia |
Mjolnir |
40
|
142
|
2.6
|
Norway |
Morokweng |
70
|
145
|
3
|
South Africa |
Tookoonooka |
55
|
128
|
5
|
Queensland, Australi |
Kara |
65
|
73
|
3
|
Russia |
Chicxulub |
170
|
64.98
|
0.05
|
Yucatan, Mexico |
Chesapeake Bay |
90
|
35.2
|
0.3
|
Virginia, U.S.A. (see Nature 388, p365,1997) |
Popigai |
100
|
35.7
|
0.8
|
Russia (see Nature 388, p365,1997) |
Kara-Kul |
52
|
5
|
Tajikistan | |
Eltanin |
30?
|
2.14
|
South Pacific -
ocean
impact (see Nature 390, p357,1997) |
|
SPECULATIVE CRATERS | ||||
Bedout | 180 | 250? | Western Australia | |
Woodleigh | 120 | 250-360? | Western Australia (PDF) Note about age. | |
Ewing Structure | 55-150 | 11 | Western Pacific? |
Several craters between 20km and 80km are missing from this table but shown in the graph. See PASSC (updated URL) for a full list of craters. "Eltanin" was an ocean impact and did not leave a crater. Bedout and Woodleigh are speculative - see below. Ewing is a possible oceanic crater. Woodleigh is now in the NRC database and Bedout is looking promising.
NRC also has an excellent series of maps of the continents over geologic time.
Uni Arizona LPL: Interactive global map of impact craters. Australia. (updated URLs) + crater timeline
National Geographic - interactive map of Earth
The Crater Page by OSR (thanks Gloria Mitchell)
Uni Tennessee: Suspected Earth Impact Sites - new (2006) online database.
University of New Brunswick - The Earth Impact Database
ChronoZoom is an
interactive display that includes geologic timescales - haven't
checked it for mass extinctions yet
More links here.
"Impacts - no crater" are cases where there is evidence of an impact, such as tektites, but no crater has been found. Eltanin (see above) is an example. The other cases are described by Dallas Abbott in a pending EPSL paper - stay tuned for an online copy.
GEOLOGIC BOUNDARIES | ||
Period or Epoch |
Ma
|
|
Precambriam/Cambrian |
570
|
|
Cambrian/Ordovician |
505
|
|
Ordovician/Silurian |
438
|
|
Silurian/Devonian |
408
|
|
Frasnian/Famennian (Trilobites) |
367
|
|
Devonian/Carboniferous |
350
|
|
Carboniferous/Permian |
286
|
|
Permian/Triassic |
250
|
|
Triassic/Jurassic |
? 208
|
|
Jurassic/Cretaceous |
144
|
|
*Cretaceous/Tertiary (Dinosaurs) |
65
|
ERUPTIONS |
Ma
|
Ethiopean Plateau |
35
|
Deccan Traps, India |
65
|
Emperor-Hawaii Chain |
65
|
Sudan Volcanics |
144
|
Central Atlantic Volcanics |
213
|
Siberian Traps |
250
|
Antrim Plateau |
511
|
On the basis of known stratigraphic constraints, more than
one
impact structures may prove to be of a P-T boundary age by
future
isotopic age studies. The Falkland structure (M.R.
Rampino)
and Bedout structure
(off
NW Australia, J.D. Gorter) are only candidate P-T impact
structures
inferred from geophysical and in the latter case drilling
data, as yet
unconfirmed and undated. As yet the magnitude of the confirmed
impact/s
is not large enough to link them to the P-T boundary
extinction and/or
as
triggers of the Siberian volcanic traps (248.4+/-2.4 Ma),
although it
is definitely possible further crater/s identification and
isotopic
dating may shed light on these questions.
Andrew Glikson, Research School of Earth Science,Institute of Advanced Studies, Australian National University
(2) POSSIBLE FALKLAND IMPACT STRUCTURE
There is a large, circular gravity anomaly on the Falkland
Plateau that
resembles anomalies associated with large impact
craters. It is
quite large; greater than 200 km in diameter.
The basin that is indicated could be Late Paleozoic or Early Mesozoic in age, but not much more is known about it. Recent papers have suggested that it is of tectonic origin, but more study is needed.
I suggested that it might be an impact structure, and should be more closely studied back in 1992.
Dr. Michael R. Rampino
Update 15 Aug 17 Terra Nova ($): Geophysical
evidence for a large impact structure on the Falkland
(Malvinas) Plateau by Rocca, Rampino and Presser
See also Duncan Steel's book "Rogue
asteroids
and doomsday comets"
P/T BOUNDARY: NO IRIDIUM
From Hermann Burchard <burchar@mail.math.okstate.edu>
Dear Benny,
In Permian/Triassic boundary strata in South China, the element iridium is not present or at most only in trace amounts, according to Doug Erwin, who kindly responded to my e-mail question. This can be understood, as I would like to suggest, by noting certain connections with the iridium-rich Hawai'i hotspot, which has been moving in a SE direction across the Pacific for >100Ma, probably 225Ma, starting off from Sibiria.
As mentioned by Victor Clube and Bill Napier in their book "Cosmic Winter", magmas from the great Hawai'i volcanoes are rich in iridium. They discuss this, because it's an argument against cometary impact as a cause of the abundance of the element in extinction layers, such as the famous K/T-boundary.
There is a clear trace on the floor of the Pacific ocean beginning with the Emperor Seamount chain from the Kamchatka Peninsula to Midway Island, then angling off in a slight left turn along the Hawai'ian island chain. Although the trace possibly is now partly subducted in the Kamchatka - Aleutian trench, it seems clear enough that the hotspot was originally positioned in Eastern Sibiria.
Underlying the hotspot is a mantle plume which presumably was created when a cosmic body hit Sibiria and created the vast flood basalts of Yakutia (Sakha). See the article by Renne et al. in "Science", 1995, 269:1314, for a map of the conjectured extent of the original lava beds, which may not have been fully explored. These cover Yakutia (Sakha), bordering directly on the Sea of Okhotsk near Magadan, immediately adjacent to the present day NW-terminus of the Emperor Seamount chain. From my less than adequate maps, the basalt beds seem to abut on or even include the Kolyma gold and diamond fields; diamonds have been studied in connection with impact sites e.g. by Christian Koeberl.)
Therefore, little doubt can exist concerning the essential identity of the following events:
1.
Inception of Hawai'i hotspot in Sibiria.
2.
Sibirian flood basalt eruption.
3.
Cause
of P/T mass extinction.
We owe the identity of 2. and 3. to the work of paleobiologists like Doug Erwin. Here, we wish to explain that event 1. probably was a cosmic body impacting in Sibiria - more precisely a spot in Gondwana-land which became present-day Eastern Sibiria.
Much of the meteoritic material from the comet or asteroid, that struck Earth at the P/T transition, appears to remain still in the hole punched in the upper mantle by the cosmic impact body, the Hawai'i hotspot (I sincerely doubt that this will seem like a very novel idea in the minds of many geologists).
Hence we may conclude:
[A] Iridium continues to be pumped upward with
deep
mantle material in Hawai'i volcanoes to this day.
[B] Little of the cosmic material was thrown into
orbit at
impact time, because of uniquely deep penetration of the giant
P/T
impactor.
[C] Iridium cannot be traced in the layers
separating
Paleozoic and Mesozoic rocks, never having been
dispersed
to a great extent.
[D] Rather than refute it, as Clube-Mapier feared,
abundant ir in the magmas from Hawai'i confirms the impact
theory
of mass
exinctions.
The relationship between impacts and hotspots is perhaps still
somewhat controversial, so I will attempt to elaborate on this.
Hotspot
physics
and geology is probably not a perfect science. If I
understand it
correctly, the main mechanism is the same as in spreading or
rift
zones:
Pressure on the upper mantle is relieved as the minerals rise
with
reduced overburden, causing a phase transition which we see as
melting.
The causes of pressure release are somewhat different in the two
arrangements of a) impact related hotspot and b) rift zone.
In case b) of a rift zone one possible initial cause of reduced
pressure seems to be thinning of continental crust due to
erosion of a
stable craton over many 100Ma. The African rift valley is a case
in
point. In North America, at the beginning of the Jurassic era,
the
Atlantic ocean first began as a rift, with the margin seen today
e.g.
in the New York palisades
rock facade. At present, the New Madrid fault along the middle
Mississippi may exemplify the same phenomena at an early stage.
However, a rift may begin with a hotspot, as one other
interpretation
of the Great African Rift suggests! One hotspot is in the Afar
region.
In case a) of an impact-induced hotspot the initial step is that the impact events destroy the phase equilibrium of the upper mantle in a narrow region underlying the crater. This may be due partly to the shock wave of impact upsetting crystalline structures, or partly because surface rocks are excavated and removed by the impact explosion. A massive melt results in the form of flood basalts from the suddenly relieved pressure, and/or from impact shock wave induced phase transition. The effect is a snowballing phase transition and melting.
Again, to avoid misconceptions, and because this does seem to
remain controversial in some circles, it should be emphasized
that:
The melt in the plume after
impact
is _NOT_ caused by the initial energy yield of impact, but
rather
by the reduced pressure which forces a phase transition to
take
place that ends up in a phase equilibrium at a lower Gibbs
energy.
(Other views [as in Renne et al.] present a picture of a spontaneous rise of mantle, liquifying over a huge area, for which no account of origin can be given. This can be considered for basalt floods, but could not explain narrow-bounded hotspots.)
Once in operation, lower mantle material appears to be resupplied continually from the sides to the punch hole, which maintains a pore where the pressure remains lower than in the surrounding mantle. Thus the plume can rise indefinitely, as we see happen today in Hawai'i.
Any computations of effect of impact on the mantle not modeling phase equilibria and transitions should be treated with suspicion. Above description of mantle plumes, to make a disclaimer, is conjectural, not substantiated by actual computation. My limited understanding of these things is based on a study of stable computation of phase equilibria, working with a petroleum engineer, on computing "flash" crude oil separation.
Although apparently still controversial, years ago already I have heard mention made by geologists of the connection of hotspots and impacts, as in the example of the Yellowstone hotspot, now in Wyoming, that has travelled East along the Snake river plateau for > 10Ma, and that is implicated in the flood basalts in Western Idaho and probably Washington State (?).
(Unfortunately, I was unable to attend the February 9 RAS conference on impacts, where Christian Koeberl was keynote speaker. I missed talks by Adrian Jones and Simon Kelly on impact, flood basalt, & hotspot related topics, that might have led me to improve this account).
Best regards,
Hermann G.W. Burchard
burchard@math.okstate.edu
See a response by Andrew Glikson, Item 12, CCNet 23 Feb 01. He questions the P/T link.
IMPACT VOLCANISM CLARIFICATION
>From Mark Boslough <mbboslo@sandia.gov> CCNet 1 Mar 01
A few inaccuracies crept into the March Scientific American article.
1) Our seismic focusing calculations showed that the peak in
seismic energy
dissipation is in the asthenosphere both antipodal and directly
beneath
the
point of impact. We suggested that for a sufficiently large
impact the
increased melting in the asthenosphere would be a significant
contributor to
any impact-induced volcanism, but we did not speculate about
effects on
pre-existing plumes or extinctions (although these ideas are
worth
considering). Our idea was that a narrow column of hotter mantle
could
create an instability that *looks* like a plume (as opposed to a
classic
fluid plume that pushes its way up from the CM boundary).
2) I'm not sure where the "may not have been antipodal" phrase
came
from.
The impact antipode was clearly something like 30 degrees from
the
Deccan
Traps at the time of the K/T boundary. If the Deccan Traps
are
impact-induced it was not the Chicxulub impact (which came too
late
and in
the wrong place!) but an earlier impact either into the east
Pacific or
into
India.
3) We suggested that an impact might generate the same surface
manifestations normally associated with mantle plumes (i.e.
flood
basalts
and long-lived hotspots). We did not connect them to superplumes
which
is
what Dallas Abbott proposed. It was Jon Hagstrum of the USGS who
suggested
the connection to sea level, weathering, ocean chemistry,
sediments,
etc.
The ideas of Abbott and Hagstrum are also interesting worth
considering--but
they're not mine as the article implies.
Mark Boslough
Sandia National Laboratories
The Shiva Hypothesis - Periodic Mass Extinctions
The Jan/Feb 98 Issue of Planetary Report has an article by Michael Rampino "The Shiva Hypothesis". This describes a 30 million year cycle of mass extinctions over the past 540 million years (see diagram). One hypothesis is that this corresponds the the solar system oscillating through the galactic plane as it orbits the Milky Way. Rampino notes that the last crossing of the galactic plane occurred a few million years ago and it has been suggested that this led to a disturbance of comets in the Oort Cloud, some of which could now be approaching the inner solar system.
This hypothesis was mentioned by Carl Sagan in the 1985 book "Comet" and first raised by Rampino and Stothers in a 1984 issue of Nature. It is still very controversial, but so was the Dinosaur/Impact hypothesis until the early 1990s.
See also:
Send suggestions for this page to Michael Paine.
Last update 16 Feb 2001
Return to Australian Spaceguard Survey