Nov 19 The Conversation: Putting homes in high-risk areas is asking too much of firefighters
Comment: The danger is not confined to rural areas. A New Scientist article about the Australian bushfires (NS 15 Nov) points out that more than 100,000 homes are within 100 metres of bushland in the Sydney area. The situation is even worse than this figure suggests because many of these are retirement villages.

This is due to a greed-driven decision in the 1990s to introduce New South Wales state planning laws that overrode local council powers and allowed retirement villages to be built on non-urban land that was adjacent to land zoned for residential use.

The vast majority of the affected land is bushland and there are now dozens of these retirement villages throughout Sydney. In our area there are several retirement villages that are next to dense bushland to the west - the worst direction for bushfires due to hot westerly winds.

It is estimated that, on average, it will take at least 12 Coaster bus trips per village to evacuate the non-driving residents. That will take many hours, particularly for mobility-impaired residents. In 1994 we saw residents boarding buses while the grass around them caught fire.

May 04: More threats from SEPP5 (Mark 2) - criticisms were ignored.

Jun 04: The Oxford Falls Seniors Retirement Development
In May 2004 Warringah Council received its biggest ever development proposal- a retirement development for 1,650 residents, to be located between Wakehurst Road, Barnes Road and Oxford Falls Road, in the Oxford Falls Valley area. Letter to council Jan05.

Jan 2020 - Liberal state member approached about bushfire risk >>>Strokes

----------------------------------------------------------- Submission  ------------------


Yours faithfully

Michael Paine

[former] Convenor, Red Hill Preservation Society

https://www.vdrsyd.com/aoaug/rhps/sepp5.html